trek fuel ex 8 mino link

Trek Fuel EX 8 review – still one of the best trail MTBs?

Trek’s alloy fuel ex trail mountain bike lacks the latest features but is the overall package still a winner.

BikePerfect Verdict

Heavy frame that misses the latest features but still a great package for fast and precise all round mountain biking

Tight, precise frame

Sorted all round handling

Very efficient suspension feel

Durable Shimano kit

Excellent sizing options

Heavy frame

No internal storage

Press fit bottom bracket

Top Fuel is more playful

Why trust BikePerfect Our cycling experts have decades of testing experience. We'll always share our unbiased opinions on bikes and gear. Find out more about how we test.

Trek’s Fuel EX has been one of the best mountain bikes in the world for years, but the alloy-framed 8 is lacking some of the features the latest alloy and carbon Treks. High-durability component spec matches the vibe of a really well-balanced bike. One that plans ahead, hands its homework in early (having double checked it) and rarely puts a wheel wrong or goads you into being silly yourself. So how has Trek done that and is there a better option in the range if you want something short on travel but big on fun?

Design and aesthetics

Trek has been using a rocker link-driven, vertical shock suspension design on its bikes for so long that “Looks like a Trek Session” is a cliche on most MTB forums. No surprise then that the Fuel EX continues the clean looks which leave plenty of room for a big bottle on the down tube and strap-on storage. You don’t get the internal storage of the newer Top Fuel alloy frame though and this older frame still uses a press-fit bottom bracket rather than reverting to a more reliable threaded  format. There are ISCG chain keeper tabs on the BB though, a wider-angle Knock Block steering limiter to stop bars hitting the frame in a crash and rear axle concentric ABP rear suspension pivot. Cunning zip tie tabbed ‘Control Freak’ internal cable routing and rubber frame armor including molded chainstay sleeves keep things quiet. 

You also get the 0.5-degree geometry change ‘Mino Link’ flip chip at the seat stay/rocker pivot. That changes head angle from 65.5- to 65-degrees and effective seat angle from 75.5- to 75-degrees on the Large I tested. Reach also shifts from 475 to 470mm and BB height drops from 346 to 340mm. The big win with choosing a Trek though is the sheer range of sizes from XXS to XXL including a sweet spot ML in the centre. Smaller bikes also run 27.5in wheels for proportional balance, too, although the chainstays are the same length on all frame sizes. The Fuel EX 8 is also available in three different two-tone color options.

Specification

Trek acknowledges that the ‘priority is on the parts’ with the EX 8 and the highlight is an almost complete Shimano XT drivetrain (the chain is SLX). The Fox Float shock is a custom unit, too, using a Penske race car derived RE:aktiv damper setup for a pert-pedaling feel on top of the 130mm travel. The 140mm Fox 34 fork is the stock Rhythm spec though and the Shimano brakes are basic four-piston MT400s. Bontrager’s functional Line component range completes the bike in well-judged, size-specific cockpit options although dropper post strokes are short on the larger sizes. Big volume versions of Bontrager’s XR5 and XR4 tires on Bontrager Line Comp 30mm internal rims put plenty of air between bike and trail for protection, too.

Performance

While the EX8 isn’t light at just under 15kg (a full kilo heavier than Trek claims) it’s in the ballpark for a mid-travel, alloy-framed bike at this price. What really stands out is how well it hides that weight when it comes to pedaling. The big tires don’t drag nearly as much as they look like they might, while the RE:aktiv shock and overall kinematic give it a really clean, crisp and stable platform to put down power from. That means even with three potential low-compression settings to play with, we rarely felt compelled to flick it out of full open unless we were hoofing uphill out of the saddle. Add the clean shifting, top-quality Shimano XT drivetrain and the Fuel EX is a great choice for high-mileage rides and riders. The fast-engaging ‘Rapid Drive’ freehub and relatively high ground clearance are a bonus for anyone who likes to kick hard out of corners or attack rough technical climbs, too. The efficient suspension feel still gives enough sensitivity to track the ground under power and you can drop pressures in the big tires if you’re into a proper ‘crawler/swamper’ feel. 

The 140mm fork/130mm rear travel feels well balanced on the trail and the Grip damper Fox Rhythm repeatedly proved why its our favorite cost-effective fork. Trek’s suspension calculator is accurate enough to get most people sorted on set-up for most situations. The angles and proportions of the model we tested were confident at speed on jumps but still turned in promptly on woodland twisters. Even the basic Shimano brakes feel better than normal through the neutral suspension responses created by the ABP pivot and the 200mm rotor up front boosts power, too.

While you could speed up reactions with a shorter stem, the stock setup probably suits its overall character better. That’s because while it will pop and play off trailside opportunities if you’re in the mood, it does tend to sit on top of an already relatively high ride height rather than sucking down onto the trail and railing. Interestingly that’s a big - and counter intuitive - difference to the Top Fuel 8. With slightly steeper angles, less travel, significantly different suspension kinematic and top-spec RockShox rear shock, Trek’s pocket rocket has an addictively playful charisma that’s very much at odds with it’s ‘XC’ categorization. 

In fact, despite it being heavier we’d probably opt for the Fuel EX for long marathon-style or efficiency-based events, especially as it’s significantly cheaper than its little brother, leaving you more cash for race entries and energy products. Just make sure you keep an eye on the press-fit bottom bracket and get it replaced as soon as it shows any signs of wobble/creak as that can eventually creates frame issues.

Trek’s Fuel range might be a bit backwards when it comes to assigning categories based on travel but the main thing is that the Fuel EX is still a really efficient, enjoyable and fitness/skill flattering all rounder. While it misses out on the internal storage, threaded BB and super-plush playfulness of the Top Fuel, Shimano XT will always bring a lot of hard riding boys (and girls) to the yard. Those are exactly the riders who’ll appreciate just how well this extremely well balanced bike covers ground and keeps a fresh and sharp feel long into the day, and down tough technical sections, too. 

Tech Specs: Trek Fuel EX 8 XT

• Price: $3,929.99 / £3,200
• Discipline: Trail
• Head angle: 66/66.5-degrees
• Frame material: Trek Alpha Platinum Aluminum
• Sizes: XS, S, M, M/L, L (tested) XL, XXL
• Weight: 14.9kg
• Wheel size: 29 x 2.3in
• Suspension (front/rear): Fox Rhythm 34, Float EVOL 140mm travel, 44mm offset/Fox Performance Float EVOL, 3-position RE:aktiv 130mm travel
• Components: Shimano XT 10-51T, 12-speed gearing, shifter, chainset and cassette. Shimano SLX chain. Shimano MT400 brakes with 200/180mm rotors. Bontrager XR4 Team Issue 29 x 2.6in front and Bontrager XR5 Team Issue 29 x 2.5in rear tires on Bontrager Line Comp 30 wheels. Bontrager Line 780 x 35mm bar and 50 x 35 mm stem, Bontrager Line Dropper 150mm dropper post, Bontrager Arvada saddle

Guy has been working on Bike Perfect since we launched in 2019. Hatched in Yorkshire he's been hardened by riding round it in all weathers since he was a kid. He spent a few years working in bike shops and warehouses before starting writing and testing for bike mags in 1996. Since then he’s written several million words about several thousand test bikes and a ridiculous amount of riding gear. To make sure he rarely sleeps and to fund his custom tandem habit, he’s also penned a handful of bike-related books and talks to a GoPro for YouTube, too.

Current rides: Cervelo ZFS-5, Forbidden Druid V2, Specialized Chisel, custom Nicolai enduro tandem, Landescape/Swallow custom gravel tandem

Height: 180cm

Weight: 69kg

• Guy Kesteven Technical-Editor-at-Large

Argon 18 Dark Matter review – one gravel bike for everything?

Rigid vs suspension gravel fork – which is faster? Well, the answer is not quite that straightforward

Michelin says its new trio of downhill tires are the grippiest it's ever made, so could they stick to the trails better than Maxxis MaxxGrip?

Most Popular

By Paul Burwell 21 March 2024

By Paul Burwell 20 March 2024

By Guy Kesteven 19 March 2024

By Jon Slade 18 March 2024

By Guy Kesteven 12 March 2024

By Richard Owen 8 March 2024

By Graham Cottingham 6 March 2024

By Guy Kesteven 6 March 2024

By Neal Hunt 5 March 2024

• Inspiration

Review: Trek Fuel EX8 Trail bike

The Trek Fuel EX 8 is Trek’s best selling trail bike. An enduro / all-mountain bike that promises to be very versatile with its ample travel of 130mm on the front and rear suspension, 29-inch wheels and a few smart features. With a 1×12 SRAM GX Eagle drivetrain and a 10-50 cassette, the Fuel is also well equipped for steep climbing and killer descents.

In itself, the Trek with these specs is not necessarily very different from other bikes. There are two elements that make the bike a bit more unique. That is the ABP and the Mino Link.

Circumstances

We had a short window of opportunity, just two weeks to ride the bike. I mention this because I normally like to ride a bit longer on the bike and preferably under various circumstances. Certainly for the Fuel EX 8 it would have been great to be able to ride it in a bit more mountainous terrain than we have available here in the Netherlands, nut we didn’t have that opportunity. We rode on the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, a natural park area in the Netherlands with technical flow trails, much more XC than enduro. Sand and forest. We drove in dry and slightly humid weather.

You can transform the bike from a more compact, steep, upright XC geometry you can go to a wider/longer and lower DH geometry.

The feeling of the Trek on the Dutch trails was really nice. The bike is quite responsive and you can thread it easily through the trails. Not a very compact geometry, by the way, the highest position of the Mino Link is less steep than actual XC bikes (of course), and on the pieces that are faster and more downhill you can (also because of the dropper-post) sit nice and low, attack the turns and really lean your bike into them. The bike climbs well (especially with lock-out on the suspension), and its power delivery is good for an enduro bike.

As for the Active Braking Pivot: this technology has to counteract the effect that if you brake, your rear frame becomes more rigid (that happens naturally with braking action in any bike) and therefore your rear suspension does not work as well. With a stiffer rear frame you will bounce more. Trek has tackled this problem by ensuring that the back swing arm on which the brake caliper is fixed “floats” independently from the rest of the frame.

As a result, the braking action does not affect the tension on the rest of the frame and the suspension can also work freely. As a result, the bike should stay track better on the trail and you’ll be more maneuverable when it gets faster and steeper.

I have to say that I did not necessarily feel that the bike was riding or steering better due to the ABP. But that also has to do with the fact that in the two weeks we had the bike at our disposal, we could only ride in the Netherlands and that steepness, speed over rocky terrain: we just don’t have it here. Another reason to hoop that we can ride the bike again under the circumstances where it is really built for.

The bike is nice and playful, it jumps well, whether it is a built jump, a trail feature or a bunny hop, it takes air easily and landing feels safe and stable.

So what does the trek bring.

If we have not been able to properly test and review those special features such as the ABP and the MinoLink, what can we say about the bike? Well above all that riding the Fuel is just a lot of fun because it is simply a good bike. The 29-inch wheels keep speed, and despite that wheel size the bike steers through the trails really well and feels nimble. On the more bumpy, downhill parts that we do have (including brake washboards) the suspension felt nice. The back suspension has the Fox Performance Float EVOL that can be set in three positions, and in front of the Fox Rhythm 34 Float. I also rode a few stairs (closest thing to rocky downhills) and the bike managed these smoothly and stable. The bike is nice and playful, it jumps well, whether it is a built jump, a trail feature or a bunny hop, it takes air easily and landing feels safe and stable.

Smooth, clean and versatile

I really liked the Bontrager XR4 Team Issue tires, with a lot of grip and sufficient speed. The aluminum frame is what you can expect from such a frame, and together with the SRAM and other Bontrager components (Bontrager is part of Trek and actually their component brand) the bike weighs around 14 kilos. Not exceptionally light but not too heavy either.

In short, a very complete and versatile bicycle of which we have not yet seen the complete potential. The Trek Fuel does well on trails in the Netherlands, but its real mountains where we expect it will really excel.

De Trek Fuel EX 8

Enduro/trail bike.

Retail price  € 2.999,00

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

Trek fuel ex 9.9 trail mountainbike | video review, report: the dutch trek fan day 2019 and the new fuel ex lineup, preview: the new trek top fuel trail bike.

I’d agree. Trek bikes are great to use in the mountains. They’re just comfortable to ride on, no matter what trail is ahead. But some of my friends are suggesting a new bike. I am not sure but they say it is one of the models at Morpheus Bikes: https://www.morpheusbikes.com/ . Can anyone help me on this?

Hi Francis, thanks for you reaction. Great to hear from you. I’m afraid we can’t help you: the Morpheus bikes look great, but they haven’t built or sold enduro/trail bikes till as far as we can tell. So no experience on that front I’m afraid. Probably also because we are based in the Netherlands (Europe) and the brand is not readily available around these parts.

Judging by their downhill and dirt bikes though, they seem to know how to build a bike.

LEAVE A REPLY Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Privacy Policy

Advertising

Notice & Takedown

© Gearlimits is onderdeel van FMH | All rights reserved

2023 Trek Fuel EX

Wheel Size: XS: 27.5’’; Small: 27.5’’ and 29’’ options; M through XXL: 29’’; all 29’’ frames also mullet compatible with a 160mm-travel fork

Travel: 140 mm rear / 150 mm front

Material: Aluminum and carbon fiber versions available

Sizes Offered: XS–XXL

• Aluminum frame w/ Fox Float X Performance: $2,600
• Carbon frame w/ Fox Float X Factory: $3,900
• Complete bikes $3,700 to $10,750

Blister’s Measured Weight: 33.1 lb / 15.0 kg (Fuel EX 9.8 XT, size Large)

Reviewer: 6′, 170 lb / 183 cm, 77.1 kg

Test Location: Western Washington

Test Duration: 4 months

Trek’s Fuel EX has long been a popular all-round Trail bike, but the new version looks like a major departure from the bike it replaced, with more suspension travel, dramatically longer / slacker geometry, a ton of new adjustability, and a substantial cosmetic overhaul to go with it. There’s a lot to cover here, so let’s get right into it:

The sixth-generation Fuel EX includes loads of updates, starting with the wild amount of adjustability on offer. The prior-generation bike had a flip chip to toggle between two geometry settings, which the new bike retains, but it adds an optional offset headset that changes the headtube angle by +/- 1.0°, as well as a second flip chip that varies the amount of progression from the rear suspension — more on all that in a minute.

The overall aesthetic design of the frame has also been overhauled to match the new Fuel EXe lightweight e-bike, but Trek’s longstanding ABP suspension design carries over (now producing 140 mm of rear wheel travel, up by 10 mm from the outgoing bike), as does the option for aluminum and carbon frame construction. No matter which frame material you opt for, you get a storage compartment in the downtube, internal cable routing across the board, ample rubber guards on the seatstay, chainstay, and downtube, and a threaded bottom bracket shell. ISCG-05 tabs are also featured, and tire clearance is stated at 2.5’’. Trek’s sometimes-irritating Knock Block headset is nowhere to be found on the new Fuel EX. All sizes can fit a water bottle inside the front triangle, though the size of the bottle is limited on the smaller frame sizes.

The Fuel EX now has a second flip chip that toggles between two different levels of rear suspension progression, which Trek amusingly simply labels “Less” and “More.” It’s essentially the same system that they introduced on the Session last year. In the “More” progression setting, the leverage curve goes from about 2.9:1 to 2.3:1 in a nearly straight line (~21% total progression); the “Less” setting drops the starting leverage ratio to about 2.75:1 (for ~16% overall progression), and the curve flattens off somewhat near bottom-out.

Fit & Geometry

Again, there’s a lot going on here — the new Fuel EX has a huge amount of geometry adjustability between the geometry flip chip (Trek calls it a “Mino Link”), optional offset headset (sold separately), and the option to run the bike with a 27.5’’ rear wheel for a mullet setup (on frame versions designed around a 29’’ front wheel). We’ll get to the full geometry charts in a minute, but to break down the highlights:

• Trek offers the Fuel EX in a whopping seven sizes (XS through XXL, with an “ML” size snuck in the middle). The XS frame is 27.5’’ only, the size Small comes in options for 27.5’’ or 29’’ wheels (each of which gets a dedicated frame — no converting back and forth), and sizes Medium and up are 29ers. All the 29er frames can be run as a mullet with the flip chip in the “High” position (and Trek recommends bumping up to a 160mm-travel fork to raise the bottom bracket a little).
• The headtube angle is 64.5° in what is probably the default position for most people (headset in the neutral position, flip chip in low, which is how Trek will ship the Fuel EX) but you can set it anywhere from 63.5° to 66° depending on how you mix and match the settings with the stock wheel size.
• Going to a mullet configuration on the 29er frames slackens things out to 63.9° in the neutral headset position; you can vary that by one degree in either direction with the offset headset.
• Reach ranges from 400 to 545 mm; all sizes get a 70.8° actual seat tube angle, with the effective measurement starting at over 78° on the smaller sizes and dropping off to 76° by the XXL.
• Chainstay length is 435 mm on the XS through M frames (irrespective of wheel size), 440 mm on the ML and L, and 445 mm on the XL and XXL.

Got all that? The geo chart for the “default” option (stock wheel size, headset in “neutral”, Mino Link in “low”) is below, and you can check out all the other configurations on Trek’s website.

Trek offers the Fuel EX in seven complete builds, and as a frame-only in both aluminum and carbon fiber — a welcome and increasingly-rare option these days. As per usual for Trek, all builds with a non-decimal number feature aluminum frames, while the “9.X” builds are carbon fiber.

[Trek is also continuing to offer the Fuel EX 5 with the prior-generation frame as the most entry-level offering in the range but here we’re covering the builds that are offered on the new sixth-generation frame.]

• Fork: RockShox 35 Gold RL
• Shock: Fox Float DPS Performance
• Drivetrain: Shimano SLX shifter, XT derailleur, Deore cassette
• Crank: Shimano Deore
• Brakes: Shimano MT4100 4-piston
• Wheels: Bontrager Line Comp 30
• Dropper Post: TransX
• Fork: Fox 36 Rhythm
• Shock: Fox Float X Performance
• Drivetrain: Shimano XT
• Brakes: Shimano M6100 lever / M6120 4-piston caliper
• Drivetrain: Shimano SLX w/ XT rear derailleur
• Brakes: Shimano M6120 4-piston
• Fork: Fox 36 Performance
• Crank: Shimano XT
• Brakes: Shimano XT 4-piston
• Wheels: Bontrager Line Elite 30 Carbon
• Dropper Post: Bontrager Line Elite
• Drivetrain: SRAM GX AXS
• Crank: SRAM GX
• Brakes: SRAM Code R
• Fork: Fox 36 Factory
• Shock: Fox Float X Factory
• Drivetrain: Shimano XTR
• Crank: e*thirteen TRS Carbon
• Brakes: Shimano XTR 4-piston
• Wheels: Bontrager Line Pro 30 Carbon
• Drivetrain: SRAM XX1 AXS
• Crank: SRAM XX1
• Brakes: SRAM Code RSC
• Dropper Post: RockShox Reverb AXS

Some Questions / Things We’re Curious About

(1) The old Fuel EX was looking a bit dated, geometry-wise, but that’s not the case with the new one, at all. So how does it stack up to a lot of the other good mid-travel Trail bikes we’ve been on recently, including the Santa Cruz Hightower, Guerrilla Gravity Smash, and Commencal Meta TR?

(2) And how does the wild adjustability of the new Fuel EX pan out on trail? Does it feel like a coherent total package across the range of options, or does it start to get a little quirky at the fringes?

FULL REVIEW

Trek has historically been a little on the conservative side when it comes to the geometry and design of their Trail bikes, so when the new sixth-generation Fuel EX launched last year, it came as a surprise — a 140mm-travel Trail bike that could go as slack as a 63.5° headtube angle, with wild new design language, and a ton of adjustability. Now having spent much of the winter and early spring on the new Fuel EX, it’s indeed quite adaptable and well-rounded — and a bike that we think could work really, really well for a lot of folks.

Fit & Sizing

Trek offers the Fuel EX in seven sizes — XS through XXL, plus an “ML” in the middle — but despite the huge size range and relatively tight steps between sizes (particularly around the middle of the range), Trek’s recommended sizing puts me (6’ / 183 cm tall) squarely on a Large frame, with no overlap onto the ML or XL sizes. And at least for my preferences and proportions, that was definitely the right call. I had an easy time getting comfortable on the Large Fuel EX — and with reach, stack, and effective top tube numbers that are all in my typically preferred range, that wasn’t a surprise.

Interestingly, Trek also lists a recommended inseam range on their sizing chart, and despite being at the bottom end of the range (at 33’’) for the Large frame, I had way more than enough room to swap in a 200 mm dropper post in place of the 170 mm one that came stock. Trek does put a 200 mm post on the XL and XXL frames, and I’m sympathetic to the idea that it’s arguably better to err on the side of shorter (so that you don’t have folks who need to swap the post to be able to ride their desired frame size — it’s easier to live with a shorter-than-ideal one than one that’s too tall, for sure). But I wanted a 200 mm post, and I bet a lot of folks on the Large frame will feel similarly.

The Fuel EX’s massive geometry adjustability is much more focused on handling and ride characteristics than fit, and my overall take on fit and sizing didn’t really change much across the range of options (which I’ll cover in a lot more detail below). There are, of course, changes to the reach, stack, and effective top tube as you tweak things via the Fuel EX’s built-in geo adjustments, but they weren’t dramatic enough to change my assessment of the overall fit. The one slight caveat there is the stack height — the Fuel EX’s is a little on the shorter side, and the high flip chip and/or slacker headset settings both reduce it a little more. It wasn’t so short as to cause me real problems getting the fit sorted out, but I did need to swap in a higher-rise bar to help out, particularly in those lower-stack-height configurations to get things high enough — but as I’ll explain below, I wasn’t a fan of the stock bar and stem anyway, rise considerations notwithstanding.

A lot of Trek’s Trail / Enduro bikes in recent years — including the prior-generation Fuel EX — have skewed more toward the compliant, grippy end of the spectrum at the expense of some efficiency and snappiness under power. The new Fuel EX flips that around. It’s quite an efficient, quick-feeling bike under power, but does a notably good job of keeping a solid chunk of the ultra-planted, grippy nature of the earlier iteration — and again, that’s despite the new Fuel EX gaining 10 mm of travel at both ends.

That’s not to say that the Fuel EX is way off the end of the spectrum in terms of efficiency or anything like that, but I’d put it a solid notch above average for a 140mm-Travel trail bike, and it pulls that off while still being entirely respectable when it comes to grip and compliance under power. It’s a really nice recipe for a well-rounded, versatile bike, and while folks who specifically loved the ultra-plush feeling ride of the earlier Fuel EX might feel like the new one has lost a little bit of the magic, I think the new Fuel EX’s suspension performance under power feels more coherent for the bike’s intended use and is going to work better for more people.

In terms of low-speed handling and technical climbing prowess, the Fuel EX’s wildly adjustable geometry makes it a lot harder to give a concise single answer as to how it performs. I’m mostly going to focus on the neutral headset setting since that’s how the bike ships, and I think it’s how most folks are going to run the Fuel EX (and for what it’s worth, it’s also how I preferred to run things), but I’ll touch on the geometry settings and how they change things in more detail below.

Anyway, around the middle of the range of geometry settings, the Fuel EX’s low-speed handling feels quite intuitive and easy but biased a little more toward offering a big sweet spot that makes it easy to keep both wheels planted and gripping, at the expense of a bit of agility at really low speeds, especially as compared to the prior-generation Fuel EX. The new one is still a pretty good technical climber and feels a lot easier to just sit on and grind without having to work to keep the front wheel planted on really steep climbs, but also isn’t quite as easy to snake through really tight spots. Running the steeper, higher geometry settings speeds up the low-speed handling and adds to pedal clearance in really chunky sections but, of course, comes with tradeoffs in higher-speed descending performance. Again, more on the various geometry settings below.

But overall, I think the Fuel EX is an excellent climber for a 140mm-travel Trail bike. The pedaling position is well sorted, striking a nice balance between a steep-ish seat tube without going so far down that road as to feel awkward pedaling around on flat ground. The suspension feels efficient first and foremost but still offers good traction for that level of efficiency and pep under power, and its handling at lower speeds is predictable and intuitive. It’s quite good, especially if you’re inclined to favor a slightly more efficient pedaling platform over the most compliant and grippy suspension performance under power, but the Fuel EX is overall well-rounded and should suit a lot of people nicely.

On the way back down, the Fuel EX is, again, a really well-rounded, versatile bike that feels at home on a fairly wide spectrum of trails. Its massive adjustability (more on that later) doesn’t hurt either, but I don’t think that most folks are going to be toggling between different settings all that often — rather, I think they’re more likely to find a preferred combination and stick with it.

But especially in the middle part of the settings range (as I’ll explain more below, I found the low flip chip / neutral headset setting to be my personal favorite), the Fuel EX strikes a nice middle ground where it’s solidly stable at speed for a 140mm-travel Trail bike but doesn’t feel like it gives up a huge amount of agility to get there. It’s not the absolute quickest handling ~140mm-travel bike in very tight, super low-speed spots, but can still navigate them just fine, and once you’re moving just a little bit, the Fuel EX’s handling feels super intuitive. Its sweet spot in terms of preferred body positioning is notably wide, especially for what is not a wildly long bike overall, and the Fuel EX hits what I think is a really nice blend of being simultaneously moderately stable while also being reasonably quick handling when you need it to be.

And especially in the lower geometry flip chip setting, the Fuel EX corners really, really well. It offers a combination of having a big sweet spot and a lot of room to move around on the bike — in a way that I tend to associate with longer, more stable Enduro bikes — but does so without being as much work to muscle around as those sorts of bikes; this serves the Fuel EX especially well there. It’s not the absolute easiest bike when it comes to slashing the rear end around and oversteering all over the place, but it’ll do that with a little input, and really shines if you’re more inclined to load up the bike through the pedals and carve your way through corners.

The Fuel EX also feels notably plush and cushy in terms of its suspension performance. As I’ll get into more in the section on the build, below, I think a lot of that is down to the rear shock tune as opposed to anything inherent to the frame itself, but the Fuel EX offers a ton of rear-wheel grip over smaller chatter and doesn’t need to be going very fast or hitting stuff hard for its suspension to open up and feel very forgiving and comfortable. The flip side of that is that I did feel like the stock suspension was a bit quick to blow through the middle part of its travel when speeds picked up, especially in choppy, high-speed sections with a lot of sharp mid-sized hits. I’ll grant that this mostly showed up when I was riding the Fuel EX on trails that most folks break out a bigger Enduro bike for, and that I tend to favor firmer compression tunes and more support over the absolute maximum grip and compliance. So I think a lot of folks will be fine with (or specifically psyched about) the lighter compression damping. But it does feel notably light, especially at higher shaft speeds.

While this doesn’t quite fit cleanly into the “Climbing” or “Descending” categories, the Fuel EX really shines in rolling, varied terrain with a bunch of grade reversals and short ups and downs. I’d attribute this to its combination of (1) good pedaling efficiency for those punchy climbs, (2) well-balanced handling with a huge sweet spot in terms of body positioning that helps avoid getting caught out when the bike hangs up in an awkward spot, and (3) notably good traction and suspension compliance at lower speeds, when you’re not able really load up the bike to generate that grip. And while there are a lot of bikes out there that I’d say similar things about — the Santa Cruz Tallboy comes to mind — what sets the Fuel EX apart is that it’s more stable and capable when you point it down a longer, steeper descent than most of the (generally more compact, shorter-travel) bikes that I’d put in a similar camp on the rolling, punchy trails.

Adjustability

The large amount of geometry adjustability on the Fuel EX is an interesting part of the story of the bike. In short, I think Trek has done a good job of offering a host of adjustments that make substantial differences to how the bike rides, without making the range of settings so broad as to make it easy to wind up in a weird combination that rides poorly.

The two flip chips (a.k.a. “Mino Links” in Trek’s parlance) do about what you’d expect. The low setting makes the Fuel EX feel a little more stable at speed and a little slower handling in tight spots, but the bigger difference is that it puts the rider noticeably lower in the bike — eight millimeters of bottom bracket height is quite a bit — and results in feeling more “in” the bike, particularly in higher-speed corners, at the expense of some pedal clearance and some ease of initiating corners by leaning the bike over with more modest input. The “More” progression setting on the Mino Link (which, again, is separate from the geometry-adjusting one) makes the suspension ramp up a little more aggressively and feel more supportive deep in the travel than the “Less” progressive setting, but that difference is comparatively modest.

I also experimented with the optional offset angle-adjusting headset (which is sold separately for folks who want it) and those results were similarly as expected — slackening the headtube made the Fuel EX more stable at the expense of some nimbleness at lower speeds and also required a slightly more forward weight bias to keep the front wheel gripping properly; going steeper makes the low-speed handling quicker but diminishes the Fuel EX’s stability and composure when you start going faster.

I think Trek has done a nice job of working out adjustment ranges that make a real difference in how the bike rides without going so off the deep end as to introduce particularly quirky behavior at the ends of the spectrum, but I had the hardest time with the steeper headset setting, because the chainstays started to feel a bit long relative to the front-center of the bike. In that configuration, the Fuel EX both preferred a more centered, upright body position to not get too far out over the front end and felt like its sweet spot got substantially smaller. Folks who specifically want a very quick-handling ~140mm-travel Trail bike might still find something to like here, but I think the vast majority of people for whom the Fuel EX is a generally good fit are going to be best suited by the stock neutral headset position. And indeed, for the bike’s intended use, the neutral headset, low / more progressive Mino Link arrangement was my preference most of the time.

Though I don’t think all that many people really need to worry about it, I’m still a fan of the fact that Trek offers a clean, easy-to-use offset headset for the bike for the tinkerers out there. The lower cup does require a headset press to install, so it’s not a super quick-and-easy change that many people are going to want to do often, but it’s not hard to do a couple of times to experiment, and the drop-in top cup never gave me any issues with creaking or anything else.

I also tried a mullet configuration on the Fuel EX briefly, but only in the neutral headset position and with the fork still at the stock 150 mm of travel, rather than the 160 mm configuration that Trek recommends. As per usual for bikes that can toggle back and forth, the mixed-wheel layout made the Fuel EX feel a bit quicker handling (particularly in mid-speed corners), a little less stable in a straight line, and made the rear end feel shorter and easier to slash around. None of those differences were huge, and I personally got along better with the full 29’’ setup (as tends to be my preference) but the Fuel EX feels like a very viable mullet candidate for folks who are inclined to go that route.

The Build & Frame

I reviewed the Fuel EX in the mid-range 9.8 XT build, and for the most part, it’s pretty nice. The Shimano XT drivetrain and brakes are great, and this pair of brakes didn’t give me much trouble with wandering bite point, as is often an issue on Shimano’s brakes in general. Carbon wheels are a rarity at this price point ($6,250), and the Fox 36 / Float X suspension combo is solid, too.

But at least for my preferences, I found the compression tune on the rear shock to feel pretty light, particularly in terms of higher-speed damping. The stock shock feels quite plush and cushy when you start hitting things harder, but gives up more support and composure than I would have preferred, particularly in high-speed, choppy sections of trail. I spoke with Trek about my thoughts re: shock tune, and their response was that they tuned their shocks to work as well as possible for as big a swath of the riding public as they could manage, but that there are inevitably tradeoffs in trying to cater to riders across a range of weights and ability levels — and they’re certainly right about all of that. My take is simply that the Fuel EX’s shock tune feels oriented more toward the lighter-damped, more plush end of the range, and that’s absolutely going to be the right call for at least some folks. Heavier / more aggressive riders, or those who just know that they tend to like firmer compression damping might just need to plan on a shock upgrade or re-valve to get the damper support that they want out of the Fuel EX, and I’m personally in that camp.

I also was emphatically not a fan of the one-piece Bontrager RSL bar and stem combo. It (arguably) looks cool and is very, very light, but the one-piece design means that there’s no way to adjust the handlebar roll and thus the effective sweep, and I found the angles of the stock setup to be quite uncomfortable. Granted, bar roll / sweep is a thing that I think I’m probably unusually picky about, but it really didn’t work for me. Happily, swapping in a conventional bar and stem is easy (and is something that I wind up doing on a lot of review bikes — like I said, I’m picky), but the one-piece design limits adjustability and I think is going to cause more folks problems there than conventional designs.

The in-frame storage on the Fuel EX generally works fine, but the opening isn’t all that big and it’s a bit hard to stuff larger stuff (e.g., a light jacket) in there. It also gave me what has to be the funniest noise issue I’ve ever encountered on a review bike. The Fuel EX that I tested had been ridden prior to getting sent our way, and when I started spending time on it, there was a muffled but noticeable rattle coming from somewhere around the downtube or bottom bracket area. As it turns out, it was a dried-out and quite-hard strawberry gummy that was rattling around in the bottom bracket shell after escaping whatever some previous rider had it stored in.

I don’t think there’s a big moral to the story here, other than to keep whatever you put in your downtube storage in some sort of pouch, whether it’s the included one or a different option of your choosing. In this case, it was mostly just amusing. The only real (but very minor) build quality note I’ve got is that the upper downtube protector started to sag a bit after a little while and looked a little ragged, but that’s hardly the end of the world.

I don’t mean for that to sound like a lot of complaining — overall, I think the build on the Fuel EX 9.8 XT is quite sensible, and generally a solid value for the money. Commenting on the couple of things where I saw room for improvement just feels a lot more noteworthy than rehashing that, yes, the Shimano XT drivetrain still works really well, etc. And while the Fuel EX 9.8 XT that I rode is a pretty good value for money, I think the 9.7 build might actually be the best bang-for-buck option in the line. On the 9.7, you get the same carbon frame, functionally very similar suspension (the Fox 36 Rhythm uses the older-generation chassis and is a little heavier than the newer 36 Performance on the 9.8 XT, but shares the same basic spring and damper design), and a slightly heavier but still strong-performing Shimano Deore / SLX / XT blend drivetrain. The loss of the carbon wheels is the biggest difference between the two at the end of the day, but for $1,550 in savings at retail price, I can live with that.

Comparisons

Here’s how the Fuel EX compares to several other bikes in its class. If you’re curious about other models, aren’t sure where to start in the first place, or have any other gear questions, you can Become a Blister Member , send us a message via the Member Clubhouse , and we’ll help you out one-on-one.

Trek Fuel EX Gen 5

I don’t have a ton of time on the prior-generation Fuel EX (which is still available from Trek, at least for the time being) but I’ve ridden one enough to know that the new sixth-generation version is pretty different. The new Fuel EX is much more stable and composed at speed, less nimble at low speeds in tight spots, and despite gaining 10 mm of suspension travel at both ends, probably pedals more efficiently. The new one is significantly “more” bike in most respects apart from pedaling efficiency.

Santa Cruz Hightower

This is one of the better comparisons here, but there are still some real differences. In the more middle-of-the-range geometry settings, the Fuel EX is a touch more stable at speed but a little less agile than the Hightower. The Fuel EX also pedals more efficiently but doesn’t offer quite as much traction under power.

But none of those differences are great enough to make them unreasonable bikes to cross-shop against each other or make it super cut-and-dried as to who should be on which bike, and they generally feel targeted at similar types of riding and use cases — just with slightly different characteristics. It’s also worth noting that their sizing breaks are a bit different, and there are likely going to be folks who simply fit one better than the other since, for example, the Large Fuel EX fits a little bigger than the Large Hightower.

Santa Cruz Bronson

Pretty different. The Fuel EX pedals a lot more efficiently than the Bronson but feels significantly less plush and cushy on the way back down. The gap in stability between the two isn’t as large as the differences in suspension performance might suggest, though the Bronson is still more bike on that front, too. And even with the Fuel EX set up as a mullet, the Bronson feels more oriented toward a riding style that favors slashing the rear end around and riding with more weight over the front end to facilitate that.

Transition Smuggler

This one’s interesting — the Smuggler and Fuel EX fit and handle pretty similarly, but feel quite different in terms of their suspension performance. The Smuggler feels much more supportive and lively whereas the Fuel EX is more plush and cushy, at the expense of some composure in really fast, rough sections (which, again, I think has more to do with the shock tune than anything to do with the frame itself). Despite the Fuel EX’s extra suspension travel, the two are pretty close in terms of pedaling performance and efficiency, though the Fuel EX definitely has an edge in terms of traction and grip under power.

Pretty different. These two are actually pretty close in terms of where they land on the super-quick handling to super-stable spectrum but differ substantially in a lot of other ways. The Ripmo has more suspension travel, and definitely feels like it — it’s more composed when plowing into rough sections of trail at speed, in particular. But its suspension also feels firmer and more supportive, as compared to the more plush and cushy Fuel EX. The Rimpo also has more of a notable preference for being ridden with a forward stance with some significant weight over the bars, whereas the Fuel EX feels happier being ridden more centered / neutrally, and has a bigger sweet spot in terms of body positioning — though I think some of that is driven by the fact that the Large Fuel EX fits just a bit bigger than the Large Ripmo we reviewed; the Fuel EX fits me better, personally, but that’s going to vary rider to rider.

Overall, the Ripmo feels like a bit more game-on, hard-charging bike whereas the Fuel EX is happier taking things easier, while still having a solid top end when you decide to open it up. In terms of pedaling efficiency, they’re not too far off from each other but I’d give a slight edge to the Fuel EX.

We Are One Arrival 152

Similar story to the Ripmo, but to a greater extent. The Arrival is a much more game-on, descending-focused bike than the Fuel EX and takes more speed and aggression to come alive, but rewards that sort of approach with an impressively stable, composed ride for a bike that’s pretty quick handling (again, when you’re on it and riding hard). The Arrival is also much more supportive and lively in its suspension performance, but less plush and cushy than the Fuel EX.

Orbea Occam LT

Also pretty different. Despite having 10 mm more rear wheel travel, the Occam LT pedals even better than the Fuel EX and feels especially sharp-handling and quick, whereas the Fuel EX is a little more stable at speed, especially in rougher terrain, but not as agile. The Fuel EX is also much more plush and forgiving in terms of its suspension performance at lower speeds but is far less nimble and pop-y than the Occam LT.

In terms of its handling and ride character, the Occam LT feels like a shorter-travel bike than it actually is, just one that’s got the extra compliance of a 150mm-travel bike when you really need it. The Fuel EX feels like “more” bike despite having a touch less suspension travel.

Orbea Rallon

The Rallon, on the other hand, is way more bike than the Fuel EX — more stable, more composed in rough sections, not as quick handling, and so on. It’s one of the most versatile, most efficient-pedaling Enduro bikes we’ve ever tested, but it still is a modern Enduro bike. The Rallon is impressively close to the Fuel EX in terms of pedaling efficiency, given that it’s got 20 mm of extra travel at each end, but the Fuel EX still wins out there. The two aren’t too far off from each other in terms of small-bump sensitivity, either, but the Fuel EX feels more plush and eager to use a lot of its travel at lower speeds and with mellower riding, whereas the Rallon is a lot more composed and supportive when you start hitting stuff harder.

The Fuel EX and Rallon do remind me of each other somewhat in terms of the way they fit and in the cornering styles they excel at most strongly — both are especially good when loading the bike up through the pedals, getting both wheels to grip hard, and carve through mid-speed, well-supported corners in particular — but the Rallon is much more bike in most respects.

Who’s It For?

The new Fuel EX is an excellent all-rounder Trail bike, especially for people who favor a slightly softer, more supple suspension setup but still want a bike that pedals quite efficiently. It’s very versatile in terms its preferred riding style(s), has a big sweet spot in terms of body positioning and approach, and offers a really nice blend of solid stability and reasonably quick handling, plus a whole lot of adjustability to dial it in to your liking. Heavier and/or more aggressive riders might find the stock suspension tune to be somewhat lightly damped for their preferences — and I’d count myself among those people — but if you’d prefer a more plush, cushy ride, or are willing to put some work into getting the suspension tuned, there’s a lot to like here.

Bottom Line

The new Fuel EX is an especially well-rounded and versatile Trail bike that we can see working for a lot of different riders — especially since it has such a broad range of frame adjustments on offer. Riders who tend to favor firmer, more supportive compression tunes are likely to find the stock setup to be a bit lightly damped, but plenty of other folks are likely to appreciate the plush, smooth ride. And though I didn’t have the opportunity to test this hypothesis, I don’t think there’s anything inherent to the frame design that would stop folks who want a firmer compression tune from getting there via aftermarket tuning or a shock swap.

I want to be careful not to make too big a deal out of the shock tune — it wasn’t quite what I wanted, but I also definitely tend to prefer firmer, more supportive compression damping and I think that the stock setup will work great for a ton of people. And I really, really like the Fuel EX otherwise — it’s an impressively versatile bike that I was able to have a great time riding on a ton of different sorts of trails and one that I would be happy to take most places in the world as my one bike and not feel like I was missing out. And it’s one that I’ve already recommended to a bunch of Blister Members who’ve reached out looking for an all-rounder one-bike quiver, because the Fuel EX is a really good one.

2 comments on “2023 Trek Fuel EX”

Great review, did you manage to get the 200mm dropper in all the way? I am thinking of getting a 200 on my size large.

Yeah, pretty easily. I run a ~780 mm seat height (center of BB to top of the seat, on 170 mm cranks).

Trek has a good seatpost insertion guide in the service manual on their site. It is worth noting that the aluminum frames have a little less insertion than the carbon ones — 265 mm vs. 281 mm for the size Large of both.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Mountain Bike Manufacturer Forums
• Bike Manufacturers

Trek Fuel - Mino Link High or Low?

• Add to quote

Just wondering who runs their Fuel in high or low and what changes you feel it makes? Mine has always been in high from the shop but not really looked in to what the low setting would achieve in positive and negative ways.  

Low position, like it as slack as possible.  

High, slack enough as-is, and I like to pedal through everything I can!  

High for me on my 27.5+. Never put it in low. My BB is low enough lol. 165mm cranks have helped though.  

Some like it higher (slightly quicker steering good for flat and climbing maneuverability, and more pedal clearance) and some like it lower (slightly more stable better for descending, and less pedal clearance). Try it both ways to find which you prefer in which conditions.  

I like it better low....it handles better in low, descends noticeably better, and I think it climbs almost as well.  

I like it in high, it handles better, climbs noticeably better, and descends almost as well.  

That's funny, I'm glad we have the 2 options!  

Apart from being more slack and having a lower BB does it effect the reach having it in low?  

Yes, reach is reduced by 7mm for 18.5 (going off 2017 chart so might be out by a mm)  

It depends where you ride and what you like. I demoed the 27.5+ version and honestly its too low and slack in the high setting. In low, its unrideable....... for me......  

Other factors can come into play too. I find that low goes well with baggies whereas high goes better with Lycra.  

I had heard that, and I think Trek markets it that way if I remember correctly....been meaning to borrow some Lycra to test it out (have to go at night though with Lycra). I do know that high is intended for use with bottles....low for Camelback, but that goes without saying.  

How do I know if mine is set high or low? I just got the Fuel, and I'm not sure.  

Explained here: http://forums.mtbr.com/trek/mino-link-experts-1000258.html  

• ?            
• 15.5M posts
• 515.9K members

Top Contributors this Month

Novotel Moscow City 4 stars Family friendly Ecocertified

88 88 photos/video

83 83 photos/video

Description

Novotel Moscow City

Hotel that makes every moment matter

The Novotel Moscow City is the only hotel in the famous Moscow City business area of the capital among the highest skyscrapers in Europe, with exciting sky decks and restaurants with panoramic views. The hotel is perfect for business and holiday. Rooms with panoramic windows, a restaurant and a bar, the InBalance welness center, 8 conference rooms, and an underground parking are at guests' disposal.

Novotel Moscow City has a good location within walking distance to the one of the largest Afimall City Shopping and Entertainment Mall, Expocenter, Moscow River Embankment and Krasnaya Presnya Park. The Hotel is also easily accessible by the public transport: several subway and public transport stations, including express to Sheremetyevo and Vnukovo International Airports.

Hospitality and high standards of one of the largest hotel operators in the world Accor in a modern business district of Russia. Novotel Moscow City is perfect for relaxation, ideal for business. Welcome!

Take advantage of the opportunity to book a buffet breakfast on the website for the price of 1,700 rubles per person! The cost of the breakfast when paid at the reception and in the MC Traders restaurant is 1,950 rubles per person.

Hotel extras

Free Wi-Fi, newspapers and maps of Moscow. 5 minutes to the Expo Center.

A minute to the Afimall shopping center with lots of shops, cafes, cinemas.

2 minutes to the highest observation deck in Europe and no-limit ice cream.

4 metro stations and Moscow Central Circle station near the hotel.

15-minutes drive to the Kremlin.

Our accommodation(s)

Page out of

Superior Room with queen-size bed

• 25 m² / 269 sq ft
• Bedding 1 x Double bed(s)
• Views: Courtyard View

From NaN RUB NaN RUB Note  *

Fees and taxes included

1 night | 1 adult

Superior Room with 2 twin beds

• Bedding 2 x Twin bed(s)
• Views: City View

Deluxe room with a double bed

Executive Room with king-size bed.

• 34 m² / 365 sq ft
• Bedding 1 x King size bed(s) and 1 x Double sofa bed(s)

Executive Deluxe Room with double bed and sofa.

• 40 m² / 430 sq ft
• Bedding 1 x King size bed(s) and 1 x Single sofa bed(s)

Deluxe with a double bed for guests with limited mobility

• Accessible room

Executive room for guests with limited mobility with King-size bed

• 33 m² / 355 sq ft

Junior suite for guests with limited mobility with a King-size bed

• 58 m² / 624 sq ft
• Bedding 1 x Double bed(s) and 1 x Double sofa bed(s)

Junior Suite Room with king-size bed and sofa

Suite Room with king-size bed and sofa

• 54 m² / 581 sq ft

City Suite with 1 King-size bed and sofa

• 75 m² / 807 sq ft

Hotel location

Presnenskaya Naberezhnaya, 2, Presnenskaya Naberezhnaya 2, Russia 123112  Moscow Russia

GPS : 55.748069, 37.53685

Contact email [email protected]

Click to copy the email address

Access and transport

Kiev railway station

Railway station

Access: 4.9 km  /  3.04 mi     15 min drive

Tourist attraction

Access: 5.6 km  /  3.48 mi     15 min drive

Historic monument

Access: 6.3 km  /  3.91 mi     15 min drive

TRETYAKOV GALLERY

Access: 7.5 km  /  4.66 mi     20 min drive

Access: 7.5 km  /  4.66 mi     18 min drive

Shuttle on call, Shuttle scheduled

Saint Basil's Cathedral

Access: 7.5 km  /  4.66 mi     15 min drive

BOLSHOI THEATER

Opera/symphony/concert hall

Access: 8.4 km  /  5.22 mi     20 min drive

"Krasnaya Presnya" park

Access: 2.1 km  /  1.3 mi     15 min walk  /  7 min drive

"Afimall City" shopping center

Shopping district

Access: 200 m  /  0.12 mi     5 min walk

Hotel services

Check-in from 03:00 PM - Check out up to 12:00 PM

• Wheelchair accessible

Fitness center

• Air conditioning
• Meeting rooms
• 100% Non Smoking Property
• Room service

MC Traders offers a wide range of delicious international cuisine and cooking classes. The guests can enjoy Early bird breakfast from 4 am; hold a meeting during a business lunch and in the evening relax next to a real fireplace in the bar.

MC TRADERS BAR

Located in the hotel lobby, the MC Traders lounge bar is the ideal place to relax. A wide range of drinks and snacks is available to suit all tastes.

4 options for you to chose from depending on your tastes. A snack at reception from 4AM. A buffet breakfast. For those in a hurry, hot drinks, orange juice and croissants served at the bar. Room service.

At our charming wellness and fitness center, you can enjoy our 2 saunas, 2 hammams (Turkish baths), relaxation rooms and massage treatments. Our mission is to make sure you can enjoy complete relaxation.

Meetings & Events

Our guest reviews

100% genuine reviews from our guests

ALL Rating  4.5/5  2,722 reviews

TripAdvisor Rating  4.5/5  1,820 reviews

Good loacation & Cozy Environment

Customer review rating 5.0/5

Anonymous Business - 3/16/2024 Confirmed reviews ALL

It was my first time staying in this hotel. It was beyond my expectations. In general; the hotel is clean well orginized and pay attention to their guest’s satisfaction.

Dear Burak! Thank you very much for your glowing review regarding your stay at Novotel Moscow City! We are thrilled to hear that you have a great impression about your stay, as well as our hotel team! It is a pleasure for us to bring comfort and positive emotions to our Guests providing courteous, warm and welcoming service. We are glad that you highly evaluated our work! We are looking forward to welcoming you back at our hotel! Warmest regards, Irina Naumova Quality and Attitude Manager.

Wonderful Stay as always !!

TripAdvisor rating 5.0/5

andyrocks_globe 3/5/2024 TripAdvisor review

During my recent stay at Novotel Moscow City from 9th to 22nd February, I was pleasantly surprised by the warm reception I received from the duty manager Marika. Her friendly demeanor and efficient handling of check-in made me feel welcome and valued as a guest as always. I also want to extend my appreciation to the night manager Maria for her attentiveness and quick response to any requests or concerns I had during my stay. Her professionalism and dedication to ensuring a comfortable experience for guests did not go unnoticed. The F&B Manager Darina and her associate Yulia deserves special recognition for their exceptional service and attention towards the incredible experience. I am extremely glad with the fact that how she is concerned with every details to make the valued guest feel exceptional during the stay. Lastly, I would like to express my deepest gratitude towards Deputy GM Marina for her overall management of the hotel. Her leadership and commitment to guest satisfaction were evident throughout my stay, and I truly felt well taken care of under her supervision.

Dear Andy! Thank you very much for your glowing review regarding your stay at Novotel Moscow City! We are thrilled to hear that you have a great impression about your stay, as well as our hotel team! It is a pleasure for us to bring comfort and positive emotions to our Guests providing courteous, warm and welcoming service. We are glad that you highly evaluated our work! We are looking forward to welcoming you back at our hotel! Warmest regards, Irina Naumova Quality and Attitude Manager.

Fantastic place

Customer review rating 4.5/5

Anonymous Friends - 1/14/2024 Confirmed reviews ALL

Good location, near to a big mall ( 4 minutes of walk ) were everything you need is available.

Dear Saud! Thank you for your kind feedback. We are glad to know that you enjoyed your stay with us. Looking forward to welcoming you back. Sincerely, Irina Naumova Quality and Attitude Manager.

Well located

Customer review rating 4.0/5

Vitaly Y. Business - 12/9/2023 Confirmed reviews ALL

1. Process of lamp light replacement should be managed more effectively. 2. It is too noisy in the inner rooms - noise from events (bad sound isolation) 3. All other aspects are on the good level.

Dear Vitaly! Thank you for your kind feedback. We are glad to know that you enjoyed your stay with us. Looking forward to welcoming you back.

well located, good stay

Davit S. Business - 12/9/2023 Confirmed reviews ALL

Thank you for everything?

Dear Davit! Thank you for your kind feedback. We are glad to know that you enjoyed your stay with us. Looking forward to welcoming you back.

In partnership with  TripAdvisor

Web-users rating

Other web-users rate our hotel

• 854 reviews 9.4/10 Location
• 1,431 reviews 7.4/10 Room
• 1,241 reviews 8.7/10 Service
• 19 reviews 3.9/10 WiFi
• 886 reviews 9.6/10 Breakfast
• 507 reviews 7.7/10 Cleanliness
• 143 reviews 5.6/10 Amenities
• 106 reviews 9.5/10 Location
• 186 reviews 7.2/10 Room
• 167 reviews 9.1/10 Service
• 140 reviews 9.6/10 Breakfast
• 55 reviews 7.1/10 Cleanliness
• 9 reviews 5.5/10 Amenities
• 116 reviews 9.6/10 Location
• 201 reviews 5.9/10 Room
• 154 reviews 8.2/10 Service
• 125 reviews 9.4/10 Breakfast
• 69 reviews 7.4/10 Cleanliness
• 66 reviews 5.4/10 Comfort
• 26 reviews 4.9/10 Amenities
• 41 reviews 9.2/10 Location
• 116 reviews 6.6/10 Room
• 82 reviews 8/10 Service
• 51 reviews 9.8/10 Breakfast
• 38 reviews 7.7/10 Cleanliness
• 35 reviews 5.8/10 Comfort
• 6 reviews 5.3/10 Amenities
• 35 reviews 9.5/10 Location
• 59 reviews 6.9/10 Room
• 52 reviews 8.7/10 Service
• 33 reviews 9.7/10 Breakfast
• 25 reviews 7.9/10 Cleanliness

Free: become a member

When making a booking at this hotel:

I earn Status & Rewards points

I can use my Rewards points

I benefit from advantages

I can take advantage of the Members' rate

Our other establishments nearby

ibis Moscow Kievskaya 3 stars

At 1.688 km

Novotel Moscow Kievskaya 4 stars

Aparthotel Adagio Moscow Kievskaya 4 stars

Mercure Arbat Moscow 4 stars

At 2.937 km

ibis Moscow Dynamo 3 stars

At 4.946 km

Novotel Moscow Centre 4 stars

At 5.358 km

Ibis budget Moscow Panfilovskaya 2 stars

At 6.247 km

Ibis Moscow Oktyabrskoye Pole 3 stars

Price from: 1 night for 1 person in the room category identified within the same price range, excluding additional services and breakfast. This refers to the lowest public price, including all taxes ( VAT and tourist tax included) for the accommodation concerned, found on https://all.accor.com/ site today, for a one-night stay in the next 20 days . Varies according to period and availability. The price is only guaranteed at the time of booking. All bookings (foreign) are payable in the local currency where the hotel is situated. Only the amount confirmed during the booking in the hotels local currency is guaranteed. An estimated conversion in your local currency may be given for reference but is not part of the contract. Your bank may charge you bank fees and/or exchange fees at the time of payment.

Moscow transport: metro, bus & taxi in Moscow | How does it work?

• August 15, 2023

Moscow transport: how does it work? Here we summarized all you need to know about Moscow city public transport (bus, metro, card Troika), but also taxi in Moscow.

Distances in Moscow: walking in Moscow

Walking. The geolocation of your accommodation in Moscow is important, because the distances are great. You’re definitely not going to be able to do it all on foot. Moscow is the largest city in Europe with more than 12 million intramural inhabitants. Besides, Moscow is made for giants, because everything is big: the avenues, the buildings, the metro stations! So, the place of your accommodation is very important. You can check our blog post: Where to stay in Moscow?

Good to know! We have written 2 other blog posts that could be helpful: Maps of Moscow and Moscow Airport Transfer.

Public transport in Moscow: prices and how does it work?

Even if you are going to be able to visit many interesting places around Red Square (see the article: Moscow Red Square ), you will certainly take the metro to get around, but also to see the most beautiful stations . Furthermore, among public transport the metro remains the fastest solution in Moscow.

Good to know! Public transport is free for children under the age of 7. More specifically, 1 adult may not purchase a ticket for 1 child under the age of 7. If you are 2 adults, it is therefore for 2 children that the trips will be free.

Tips for Moscow city transport

Here are my tips to make travel more pleasant and optimized:

• Avoid to take Moscow City transport during rush hours. Especially for ground transportation (lots of traffic jams). You will lose a lot of time, especially for city center trips by land transport. Peak hours correspond to office hours: the standard working day begins at 9 a.m. and ends at 6 p.m.
• Use a mobile application to estimate your journey time as accurately as possible. In Europe, as in Russia, we use CityMapper . It is a free application that allows you to calculate your trips and see all the possibilities to get from one place to another. For the application to work, you must have an Internet connection: either through your French package which can prove to be expensive; either by wifi, in your hotel, in a cafe (very common in Moscow) or by using the free Wi-Fi of the city of Moscow! To download CityMapper on your mobile, just type its name in AppStore or GooglePlay . Then choose the city where you want to use it.
• Buy a transportation card. If you plan to take public transport several times a day or if you come to Moscow for a university or work exchange, it is more economical to take a transport card. I talk about it later in the article.
• Further info about airport transfer here: How to get from airport to Moscow?

Moscow metro: the fastest way to get around Moscow

Beautiful! The Moscow Metro is considered the most beautiful in the world! You can find out which stations are worth a visit in my article: The most beautiful stations in Moscow .

Metro timetables. Times vary by station, but approximately the Moscow Metro is open from 5.30 a.m. to 1 a.m.

Below you can find a map of the Moscow metro, with an example of a metro station. You can find other Moscow maps here .

Metro prices in Moscow

• A single trip = 57 rubles (from February 1, 2020)
• Price for transporting a suitcase in the metro = 60 rubles
• With a transport card , the price of the journey decreases. Example: with the Troika card the price per trip increases to 40 rubles. More details about troika card below.
• You can also pay with ApplePay or GooglePay.

Where to buy metro tickets?

• At the cash desks , where you can buy everything: transport card or one-way tickets. Small flat: most of the time, the employees of the metro do not speak English very well. But they are used to it, you will be able to understand each other.
• At the English terminals , where you can also buy everything. See below for more details on terminal purchases.

Bus, trolleybus, tram in Moscow

Avoid at peak hours. The city center can be literally blocked! Mobile applications are very useful to estimate travel times.

Tram. Trams are very nice to do. It’s a bit special. Tram stops are hard on the road. The cars then stop and let the pedestrians get on or off the tram.

Price of a bus, trolleybus or tram ticket

• One way = 57 rubles (from February 1, 2020)
• With a transport card , the price drops. Example: with the Troika card the price per trip increases to 40 rubles. More details about transport cards below.

Where to buy bus, trolleybus or tram tickets?

To drivers. There are no controllers on each bus, as in St. Petersburg.

By purchasing a transport card in advance at a metro station. There are few terminals installed near bus, tram or trolley stations.

Good to know! It is possible to pay on the metro, but also on buses with your smartphone or a contactless card (Apple Pay or Google Pay)! The price is 44 rubles per way. Beware, however, of bank charges, as for other ruble payments in Russia. See article: How to pay in Russia?

Transport cards in Moscow

Two most interesting solutions for taking Moscow City transport:

Troika card prices

• 1 metro, bus, trolley bus or tram journey: 40 rubles (instead of 57)
• 90 minutes in public transport (regardless of the number of changes): 62 rubles

How to buy a Troika card?

• Cost of purchase : 50 rubles. You can get it at all metro stations.
• Refill . Once the card is purchased, you must reload it. You can choose the amount freely.
• Where? It is possible to buy the card and recharge it at the metro cash desks or via automatic terminals, in cash or by bank card.

The Troika card is interesting if you:

• want to take advantage of lower transportation rates.
• stay in Moscow for a long time (language stays, expatriation, VIE, university exchange), but do not go for frequent daily trips.
• don’t stay long, but you know roughly how many trips you’re going to make or you don’t mind reloading the card often. Why? It is possible, but long and complicated to recover the initial amount of 50 rubles, as well as the rest on the card.

How much does the unlimited Yediny card (central Moscow area) cost?

• 1 day = 24 hours = 230 rubles
• 3 days = 438 rubles
• 30 days = 2170 rubles
• There are no unlimited cards for 2, 4, 5, 6 or 7 days.

More details: Moscow transport website

How to buy a Yediny card?

It is possible to buy the card and recharge it at the metro cash desks or via automatic terminals, in cash or by bank card. The card is activated (the countdown starts) at the time of validation and not at the time of purchase. The card must be activated within 10 days of purchase (day of purchase included).

Here are the pictures of the automatic terminal (in English), when buying a Yédiny card.

The Yediny card is interesting if you:

• stay in Moscow for a long time (language stays, expatriation, university exchange), but make frequent daily trips.
• do not stay in Moscow for a long time, but do not want to estimate your trips in advance (Troika card) while enjoying the unlimited.

Our experience with transport cards in Moscow

When I was working in Moscow, I used the Troika card. It was the most economical solution for me. We also used it later when we both went there. On the other hand, the last time we were there, we took the Yediny card and finally we found it more practical, even if it turned out to be less economical in the end.

Our verdict (compared to our travel habits): budget side, the Troika card is better. But for less headache (how much to put on the card? How much is left?…), The unlimited Yediny card is more practical.

Boat trips in Moscow

There are several boat trips on the Moskva River. In addition, it is even possible to buy an unlimited day ticket. For more information, you can then consult the article: Take a boat trip on the Moskva River.

Getting around in Moscow by taxi

There are several types of taxis in Moscow:

• First, official taxis (sign on the roof);
• Then individuals who do this out of the blue;
• And finally Moscow taxis via mobile applications (private drivers or taxi agencies).

Good to know. The cost of a taxi ride to the city center in Moscow is around 500 rubles. If you want to avoid negotiations, use the taxi apps in Moscow.

Uber Moscow: NO.

It works before, but not anymore, because Uber does not use the classic app in Russia (they have created a special app for Russia, only this app works now). So, you have to download the special Uber Russia app… but this application is only available on the Russian AppStore, so it cannot be downloaded for us. Uber’s competitors in Russia such as YandexTaxi or Gett can be used.

Use the YandexTaxi app to take a taxi in Moscow

The Yandex company is the Russian Google. Initially a search engine, it also offers several services. YandexTaxi is then the taxi service in Moscow, it works everywhere in Russia. You can download the app from the AppStore or GooglePlay . Thanks to this application, it is possible to pay the taxi in cash (by default) or by bank card directly (to be specified in the application). If you are thinking of paying in cash, then have rather small denominations so that the driver can give you change. The application is now in French.

How does YandexTaxi work?

• First, it detects your geolocation.
• Then you indicate your arrival position using the Latin or Cyrillic alphabet.
• It then offers you the estimated prices for each range (thrifty, business, etc.).
• You choose, confirm and wait for the driver to arrive.
• You identify the driver with the indicated license plate, then at the end YandexTaxi collects the race via your bank card (do not forget to put your card info before using the app, otherwise pay in cash).

Other solution. You can also book a taxi in advance on KiwiTaxi website . It’s easy!

Public transport and taxi in Moscow: summary

Getting around Moscow is quite simple, as Moscow City transport is well developed. However, because of traffic jams, the metro is the quickest solution. It isn’t an issue, because the Moscow metro is very clean and beautiful. Taxis are rather cheap and easy to find thanks to mobile applications like, for example, YandexTaxi.

Moscow travel tips:

• Bolshoi Theater: how to buy tickets?
• Where to eat in Moscow?
• Where to stay in Moscow?
• How to get from airport to Moscow?

Top places to see in Moscow:

• What to visit in Kremlin?
• Red Square Moscow: everything you need to know
• Saint Basil’s Cathedral: tickets & what to see inside?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Mariinsky Theatre in Saint Petersburg: tickets, best places, dress code

Novodevichy convent and cemetery in moscow: tickets, cemetery map, you may also like.

Christmas and New Year in Moscow: best markets and decorations to see

• September 18, 2023

Trains from Moscow to St Petersburg | Tickets, time, how does it work?

• December 6, 2023

Where to stay in Moscow: best districts & hotels in Moscow, what to avoid

• February 13, 2024

Free Moscow map in English: Moscow metro map and city centre map

• December 12, 2023

Weekend in Moscow | What to do in Moscow for a long weekend?

• June 22, 2023

Things to do in Moscow: how to visit Moscow | Unmissable, cool & unusual

• September 2, 2023

• Fuel EX 9.8 29

• Skyscrapers
• Apartments for Sale
• Apartments for Rent
• Houses for Sale
• Houses for Rent
• Luxury Real Estate
• Mansions in Russia
• Palaces in Russia
• Watch Video
• Residence permit in Russia

Apartment 76 sqm on the 34th floor in NEVA TOWER

Apartment 193 sqm on the 52nd floor in Moscow City

• 3 Bathrooms
• $15,000/one square meter

New residential skyscraper Capital Tower in Moscow City for investors

• $4,200/Monthly

Apartment 114 sqm on the 55th floor in the Mercury Tower

• Contact for price

Apartment 96 sqm on the 28th floor

• 2 Bathrooms

Apartment in the Mercury Tower / on the 43rd floor

Apartment on the 63rd floor in the OKO tower

Apartment on the 85th floor in the Federation Tower

Apartment 107 sqm in the OKO tower

Apartment 110 sqm on the 56th floor in the Federation Tower

• $6,100/Monthly

2-room apartment on the 51st floor

Apartment 193 sqm on the 52nd floor of Moscow City

• $22,500/Monthly

Office 248 sqm for rent in a skyscraper on the 38th floor

• $5,800/Monthly

3-room apartment 110 sqm on the 41st floor

• $5,100/Monthly

2-room apartment 102 sqm on the 45th floor

• $8,400/Monthly

3-room apartment 187 sqm on the 33rd floor

4-room apartment 188 sqm on the 40th floor

• $5,200/Monthly

2-room apartment on the 73rd floor in Moscow City

• $7,500/Monthly

3-room apartment 225 sqm on the 24th floor

• $3,800/Monthly

2-room apartment on the 51st floor in the Mercury Tower

3-room apartment 220 sqm on the 27th floor

3-room apartment on the 26th floor in Moscow City

2-room apartment on the 61st floor in the OKO tower

• $4,300/Monthly

2-room apartment on the 53rd floor

• $4,800/Monthly

Apartment on the 32nd floor in the Tower of Capitals

Apartments in Moscow City on the 54th floor

Office space 2670 sq ft in Moscow City

Moscow City apartment on the 50th floor

• $2,900/Monthly

2-room apartment 655 sqf in Moscow City

If apartments in Moscow skyscrapers are too expensive for you, then look at the cheaper apartments in this catalog .

Compare listings

Reset Password

Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Send a Request